Wednesday, March 14, 2007

300: It May Be Just 300 Dudes to You, But It's 600 Biceps to Me



Zack Snyder, 2007

3.5 stars*

Things I learned from 300: Spartans are the hottest ancient Greeks, Persia’s king was an eight-foot-tall drag queen, and shirts should really be optional as they serve no purpose except to limit a (my) healthy appreciation of pectoral muscles.



Surely there must be something else to say about this long-awaited, heavily-promoted, graphic-novel-adapted film? Let’s see, 300 tells the story of a Spartan king who, for a couple of hasty reasons, rounds up 300 hot guys in their underwear and marches them off to war against a giant Persian army with nothing more than some shields, spears, and a strategy simple enough to be depicted by a few drawn lines in the sand. Each of these elite soldiers has been rigorously trained since birth to yell “HOO!!” when necessary, which appears to be whenever their king yells a sentence that ends with “…SPARTAAAA!”,” …SPARTAAAANS!”, or “…GLORYYYY!” The only other remaining piece of plot information is just whether or not they win or lose, and if you are a sweet, innocent lamb who really can’t figure it out in the first ten minutes, I’m not going to be the one to ruin it for you.



Now I’m afraid that I’ve deterred you from slapping down some ticket money and getting pumped about seeing this movie in the theater. Plot or no plot, 300 is an amazing feat, a very non-Spartan approach to filmmaking. The color treatment alone is enough to make it worth seeing, much less the striking presence of the main character, who it’s impossible not to follow on-screen, even when surrounded by nearly-identical dudes. I was doing some research on Gerard Butler, the hard-as-nails King Leonidas, to confirm my suspicion that a Scottish accent kept breaking through his majestic lines, and I was surprised/delighted/dismayed to learn that he was the adorable Archie in Mrs. Brown. I would never, ever have recognized him due to what I believe is some sort of prosthesis going on here in order to make his face look more Spartan. David Wenham (aka “Faramir”) and Vincent Regan (aka “that guy from Troy”) are immediately recognizable, however, as they basically play tiny, one-dimensional slivers of former roles.



Everything’s pretty one-dimensional in this film, to be honest, as all of the energy was obviously focused into creating something stunning and original. With that mission accomplished, nobody seemed to go back over the film and think “what a breathtaking representation of…nothing.” Because of this, a review about 300 is very difficult to write. 300 expresses nothing and signifies nothing. It is what it is – eye candy. But the reason reviews of it aren’t terrible is that it is some of the finest eye candy yet, and it’s hard to pan something that’s so unique and truly deserves to be seen on a big screen.



I know what you’re thinking. “But it’s made from a graphic novel! It’s not supposed to be King Lear! Meh meh meh! Frank Miller!” Look, all I’m saying is, Sin City managed to include “awesome-looking” in one giant package of “awesome.” It hit the visual highs necessary to make it groundbreaking while also including some substance. Of course, that film also had the benefit of the stupendous Robert Rodriguez, one of my favorite filmmakers ever, who managed to take Frank Miller’s handiwork and make it into a masterpiece in its own right. 300 won’t quite rob of you of speech, but it’ll certainly leave an impression. And sometimes thinking is overrated, you know? Sometimes we all just gotta sit back and enjoy the nearly nude men on the screen who are engaged in combat for their honor.

*I'm starting to rate movies, just to make sure there's not ambiguity over what I think and because I give them all ratings in my head anyway. I'm expanding Netflix's five star rating system into a ten point one (that is, half stars and whole stars) because I need more gray area. I LOVE Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, but do I really think it's as good as The Departed? I mean, really? This allows me to save five star ratings for the true masterpieces. If you're Netflix and you're reading this, take note.

8 comments:

claybee said...

This is the first review of this movie I've read that hasn't made me not want to go see it. Does that make any sense?

Susan said...

It doesn't NOT make sense.

MaxPower said...

Personally I favor a quarterback who can run *and* pass. Since we have a deficiency of offensive line men a QB with a little mobility could take the pressure of our young OL.

LBH we don't need a MV3, just someone who can move the pocket around a bit when he comes under pressure.

Capisce?

claybee said...

Huuh?

Tim said...

You lost me at Sin City. I actually fell asleep halfway through that one. In a theater no less.

Susan said...

I admit that maybe I'm a little Rodriguez-biased sometimes (although I really truly love Once Upon a Time in Mexico, and I'm not sure I believe that it's just a question of my Depp/Rodriguez bias, I actually think it's a great movie), but my BF Roger Ebert agrees with me on Sin City, and Ross agrees with me about quarterbacks. That's football, right?
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050331/REVIEWS/50322001/1023

Rev. Rick said...

I would totally move in to that movie if it were a house.

Sumo said...

They should have called it '350', it was that good.